0.06/0.12	% Problem    : theBenchmark.p : TPTP v0.0.0. Released v0.0.0.
0.06/0.13	% Command    : run_E %s %d THM
0.13/0.34	% Computer : n015.cluster.edu
0.13/0.34	% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
0.13/0.34	% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
0.13/0.34	% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
0.13/0.34	% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
0.13/0.34	% CPULimit   : 960
0.13/0.34	% WCLimit    : 120
0.13/0.34	% DateTime   : Tue Aug  9 02:14:41 EDT 2022
0.13/0.34	% CPUTime    : 
0.19/0.46	Running higher-order on 8 cores theorem proving
0.19/0.46	Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover-ho --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=120 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
0.19/0.47	# Version: 3.0pre003-ho
0.19/0.48	# Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSMCHHA.
0.19/0.48	# Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 120 seconds (960 total)
0.19/0.48	# Starting ho_unfolding_3 with 600s (5) cores
0.19/0.48	# Starting ehoh_best_sine_rwall with 120s (1) cores
0.19/0.48	# Starting new_bool_3 with 120s (1) cores
0.19/0.48	# Starting new_bool_1 with 120s (1) cores
0.19/0.48	# new_bool_3 with pid 2538 completed with status 0
0.19/0.48	# Result found by new_bool_3
0.19/0.48	# Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSMCHHA.
0.19/0.48	# Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 120 seconds (960 total)
0.19/0.48	# Starting ho_unfolding_3 with 600s (5) cores
0.19/0.48	# Starting ehoh_best_sine_rwall with 120s (1) cores
0.19/0.48	# Starting new_bool_3 with 120s (1) cores
0.19/0.48	# SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
0.19/0.48	# ...ProofStateSinE()=6/9
0.19/0.48	# Search class: HGUNF-FFSS00-SHHFFSBC
0.19/0.48	# partial match(2): HGUNF-FFSF00-SHHFFSBN
0.19/0.48	# Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 120 seconds (120 total)
0.19/0.48	# Starting ho_unfolding_3 with 54s (1) cores
0.19/0.48	# ho_unfolding_3 with pid 2540 completed with status 0
0.19/0.48	# Result found by ho_unfolding_3
0.19/0.48	# Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSMCHHA.
0.19/0.48	# Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 120 seconds (960 total)
0.19/0.48	# Starting ho_unfolding_3 with 600s (5) cores
0.19/0.48	# Starting ehoh_best_sine_rwall with 120s (1) cores
0.19/0.48	# Starting new_bool_3 with 120s (1) cores
0.19/0.48	# SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
0.19/0.48	# ...ProofStateSinE()=6/9
0.19/0.48	# Search class: HGUNF-FFSS00-SHHFFSBC
0.19/0.48	# partial match(2): HGUNF-FFSF00-SHHFFSBN
0.19/0.48	# Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 120 seconds (120 total)
0.19/0.48	# Starting ho_unfolding_3 with 54s (1) cores
0.19/0.48	# Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
0.19/0.48	# Presaturation interreduction done
0.19/0.48	
0.19/0.48	# Proof found!
0.19/0.48	# SZS status Theorem
0.19/0.48	# SZS output start CNFRefutation
0.19/0.48	thf(decl_22, type, epso: ($o > $o) > $o).
0.19/0.48	thf(decl_23, type, epsoo: (($o > $o) > $o) > $o > $o).
0.19/0.48	thf(decl_24, type, q: ($o > $o) > $o).
0.19/0.48	thf(decl_25, type, esk1_0: $o).
0.19/0.48	thf(decl_26, type, esk2_0: $o).
0.19/0.48	thf(decl_27, type, esk3_0: $o).
0.19/0.48	thf(decl_28, type, epred1_0: ($o > $o) > $o).
0.19/0.48	thf(decl_29, type, esk4_1: $o > $o).
0.19/0.48	thf(qkf, axiom, (q @ (^[X6:$o]:(~($true)))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', qkf)).
0.19/0.48	thf(c, conjecture, (q @ (epsoo @ epso)), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', c)).
0.19/0.48	thf(qkt, axiom, (q @ (^[X5:$o]:(($true)))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', qkt)).
0.19/0.48	thf(qid, axiom, (q @ (^[X7:$o]:((X7)))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', qid)).
0.19/0.48	thf(choiceaxo, axiom, ![X3:$o > $o]:((?[X4:$o]:((X3 @ ((X4))))=>(X3 @ ((epso @ X3))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', choiceaxo)).
0.19/0.48	thf(choiceaxoo, axiom, ![X1:($o > $o) > $o]:(((X1 @ (epsoo @ X1))<=?[X2:$o > $o]:((X1 @ X2)))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', choiceaxoo)).
0.19/0.48	thf(c_0_6, plain, (q @ (^[Z0:$o]:(~($true)))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[qkf])).
0.19/0.48	thf(c_0_7, negated_conjecture, ~(q @ (epsoo @ epso)), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[c])])).
0.19/0.48	thf(c_0_8, plain, (q @ (^[Z0:$o]:(($true)))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[qkt])).
0.19/0.48	thf(c_0_9, plain, (q @ (^[Z0:$o]:(((($true))!=(($true)))))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6])).
0.19/0.48	thf(c_0_10, plain, (q @ (^[Z0:$o]:((Z0)))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[qid])).
0.19/0.48	thf(c_0_11, negated_conjecture, ~((q @ (epsoo @ epso))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7])).
0.19/0.48	thf(c_0_12, plain, (q @ (^[Z0:$o]:(($true)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8])).
0.19/0.48	thf(c_0_13, plain, (q @ (^[Z0:$o]:(~($true)))), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[c_0_9])).
0.19/0.48	thf(c_0_14, plain, (q @ (^[Z0:$o]:((Z0)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10])).
0.19/0.48	thf(c_0_15, plain, ((^[Z0:$o]:(($true)))!=(epsoo @ epso)), inference(ext_sup,[status(thm)],[c_0_11, c_0_12])).
0.19/0.48	thf(c_0_16, plain, ((^[Z0:$o]:(~($true)))!=(epsoo @ epso)), inference(ext_sup,[status(thm)],[c_0_11, c_0_13])).
0.19/0.48	thf(c_0_17, plain, ((^[Z0:$o]:((Z0)))!=(epsoo @ epso)), inference(ext_sup,[status(thm)],[c_0_11, c_0_14])).
0.19/0.48	thf(c_0_18, plain, ~((epsoo @ epso @ ((esk1_0)))), inference(neg_ext,[status(thm)],[c_0_15])).
0.19/0.48	thf(c_0_19, plain, (epsoo @ epso @ ((esk3_0))), inference(neg_ext,[status(thm)],[c_0_16])).
0.19/0.48	thf(c_0_20, plain, ((epsoo @ epso @ ((esk2_0)))<~>(esk2_0)), inference(neg_ext,[status(thm)],[c_0_17])).
0.19/0.48	thf(c_0_21, axiom, ![X3:$o > $o]:((?[X4:$o]:((X3 @ ((X4))))=>((~(epso @ X3)|(X3 @ $true))&((epso @ X3)|(X3 @ $false))))), inference(fool_unroll,[status(thm)],[choiceaxo])).
0.19/0.48	thf(c_0_22, plain, ((esk1_0)<~>(esk3_0)), inference(ext_sup,[status(thm)],[c_0_18, c_0_19])).
0.19/0.48	thf(c_0_23, plain, ((epsoo @ epso @ (~($true)))|(esk2_0)), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(dynamic cnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_20])])).
0.19/0.48	thf(c_0_24, plain, (~((epsoo @ epso @ (($true))))|~((esk2_0))), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(dynamic cnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_20])])).
0.19/0.48	thf(c_0_25, plain, ![X1:($o > $o) > $o]:((?[X2:$o > $o]:((X1 @ X2))=>(X1 @ (epsoo @ X1)))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[choiceaxoo])).
0.19/0.48	thf(c_0_26, plain, ![X14:$o > $o, X15:$o]:(((~(epso @ X14)|(X14 @ $true)|~(X14 @ ((X15))))&((epso @ X14)|(X14 @ $false)|~(X14 @ ((X15)))))), inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_21])])])])).
0.19/0.48	thf(c_0_27, plain, (~((esk1_0))|~((esk3_0))), inference(dynamic cnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_22])).
0.19/0.48	thf(c_0_28, plain, ((esk2_0)|(esk1_0)), inference(ext_sup,[status(thm)],[c_0_18, c_0_23])).
0.19/0.48	thf(c_0_29, plain, (~((esk3_0))|~((esk2_0))), inference(ext_sup,[status(thm)],[c_0_24, c_0_19])).
0.19/0.48	thf(c_0_30, plain, ![X12:($o > $o) > $o, X13:$o > $o]:((~(X12 @ X13)|(X12 @ (epsoo @ X12)))), inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_25])])])).
0.19/0.48	thf(c_0_31, plain, ![X2:$o > $o, X4:$o]:(((epso @ X2)|(X2 @ (~($true)))|~((X2 @ ((X4)))))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_26])).
0.19/0.48	thf(c_0_32, plain, ~((esk3_0)), inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_27, c_0_28]), c_0_29])).
0.19/0.48	thf(c_0_33, plain, ![X1:($o > $o) > $o, X2:$o > $o]:(((X1 @ (epsoo @ X1))|~((X1 @ X2)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_30])).
0.19/0.48	thf(c_0_34, plain, (epso @ (^[Z0:$o]:((Z0)))), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(eliminate_leibniz_eq,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[]), c_0_31])])])).
0.19/0.48	thf(c_0_35, plain, (esk1_0), inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(dynamic cnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_22]), c_0_32])).
0.19/0.48	thf(c_0_36, plain, ![X2:$o > $o, X4:$o]:(((X2 @ (($true)))|~((epso @ X2))|~((X2 @ ((X4)))))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_26])).
0.19/0.48	thf(c_0_37, plain, (epso @ (epsoo @ epso)), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_33, c_0_34])).
0.19/0.48	thf(c_0_38, plain, ~((epsoo @ epso @ (($true)))), inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_18, c_0_35])).
0.19/0.48	thf(c_0_39, plain, ![X4:$o]:(~((epsoo @ epso @ ((X4))))), inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_36, c_0_37]), c_0_38])).
0.19/0.48	thf(c_0_40, plain, ($false), inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_19, c_0_39]), ['proof']).
0.19/0.48	# SZS output end CNFRefutation
0.19/0.48	# Parsed axioms                        : 9
0.19/0.48	# Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 3
0.19/0.48	# Initial clauses                      : 7
0.19/0.48	# Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
0.19/0.48	# Initial clauses in saturation        : 7
0.19/0.48	# Processed clauses                    : 58
0.19/0.48	# ...of these trivial                  : 3
0.19/0.48	# ...subsumed                          : 5
0.19/0.48	# ...remaining for further processing  : 50
0.19/0.48	# Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 2
0.19/0.48	# Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
0.19/0.48	# Backward-subsumed                    : 6
0.19/0.48	# Backward-rewritten                   : 7
0.19/0.48	# Generated clauses                    : 66
0.19/0.48	# ...of the previous two non-redundant : 53
0.19/0.48	# ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
0.19/0.48	# Contextual simplify-reflections      : 1
0.19/0.48	# Paramodulations                      : 24
0.19/0.48	# Factorizations                       : 0
0.19/0.48	# NegExts                              : 4
0.19/0.48	# Equation resolutions                 : 2
0.19/0.48	# Propositional unsat checks           : 0
0.19/0.48	#    Propositional check models        : 0
0.19/0.48	#    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
0.19/0.48	#    Propositional clauses             : 0
0.19/0.48	#    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
0.19/0.48	#    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
0.19/0.48	#    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
0.19/0.48	#    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
0.19/0.48	#    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
0.19/0.48	#    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
0.19/0.48	#    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
0.19/0.48	#    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
0.19/0.48	# Current number of processed clauses  : 24
0.19/0.48	#    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 9
0.19/0.48	#    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
0.19/0.48	#    Negative unit clauses             : 10
0.19/0.48	#    Non-unit-clauses                  : 5
0.19/0.48	# Current number of unprocessed clauses: 6
0.19/0.48	# ...number of literals in the above   : 9
0.19/0.48	# Current number of archived formulas  : 0
0.19/0.48	# Current number of archived clauses   : 27
0.19/0.48	# Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 44
0.19/0.48	# Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 39
0.19/0.48	# Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 6
0.19/0.48	# Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 43
0.19/0.48	# Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
0.19/0.48	# BW rewrite match attempts            : 9
0.19/0.48	# BW rewrite match successes           : 3
0.19/0.48	# Condensation attempts                : 58
0.19/0.48	# Condensation successes               : 0
0.19/0.48	# Termbank termtop insertions          : 1742
0.19/0.48	
0.19/0.48	# -------------------------------------------------
0.19/0.48	# User time                : 0.006 s
0.19/0.48	# System time              : 0.003 s
0.19/0.48	# Total time               : 0.008 s
0.19/0.48	# Maximum resident set size: 1816 pages
0.19/0.48	
0.19/0.48	# -------------------------------------------------
0.19/0.48	# User time                : 0.006 s
0.19/0.48	# System time              : 0.005 s
0.19/0.48	# Total time               : 0.011 s
0.19/0.48	# Maximum resident set size: 1728 pages
0.19/0.48	EOF